Why can be Public Health A Controversial Issue?
- July 18, 2017
- Posted by: marlenedubois
- Category: Home Health Aide Training
Attempts to resist any change in which will directly or indirectly involve spending public money are challenged by the opposition group. For instance the drug regiments introduce inside the mid-1990s in which are capable of controlling the damage HIV/AIDS virus wreaks inside the immune system was costing an average of $10,500 for a year’s supply. Often times when public health makes their recommendation for ways of preventing along with controlling sexually transmitted diseases, government along with businesses have an obligation to determine the cause along with effect in which the recommendation will have on the economy for its affordability along with the effect in which might have on the general economy.
Politics plays a very prominent role in how public health responds to sexually transmitted diseases. in which plays important role because some politicians will not be willing along with open to bring upon their constituents any expensive public health measures in which would likely impose additional hardship to his constituents. Consequently, passing such bills will mean denying themselves their constituents vote during elections. These controversies are in part what they are because according to those who pay for the public health measures are not the ones in which benefit through in which; if bills are not sponsored along with pass by the legislators then there can be no funding which impacts heavily on how public health responds to situations especially those of sexually transmitted diseases like STDs along with HIV/AIDS. Another way politics play an important role could be seen when President Bush forces the center for the disease control to change an effective sex education which involves the use of condoms in preventing the spread of HIV/AIDS that has a false data of condom failure rates.
US constitution weighs heavily on individuals liberty along with as such every decision, be in which for the sake of public health or justice must put into consideration the individuals liberty before the public’s interest which can be why Beauchamp’s arguments in favor of limiting individual’s liberty for the common not bad can be consistent with his view of public health as a social justice. Although we are made to believe in which the value of an individual’s liberty may be more important than the interest of the public health, along with safety, This particular only applies to the certain issues however not in all situations. The government will go along with public health recommendations. Even if in which infringes on an individual’s liberty if there can be no controversies with such recommendations.
Religion along with morals with regards to the sexually transmitted diseases particularly the HIV/AIDS was fulminated by the fundamentalist preachers along with conservative legislators as God’s punishment for abominable behavior along with in which people with HIV/AIDS deserved their fate. If half of those whose resources funds the public health issues still believe the above statement, then in which definitely will affect the role in which public health plays in responding to the prevention along with control of diseases such as STD along with HIV/AIDS.
Challenges along with controversies in which exist for HIV/AIDS outside United States include funding treatment for those living with HIV/AIDS. Funding can be needed to train more medical staff, avoid drug shortages, combine HIV/AIDS care with care for some other health problems, reduce HIV stigma along with discrimination along with make sure in which more people use HIV/AIDS counseling along with testing services.
some other challenges include the morals along with religious issues in educating people on how to control along with prevent sexually transmitted infections in some countries. For example, in some cultures discussion of HIV/AIDS can be perceive as a taboo along with are not welcome for public discussion.
Market Justice emphasizes on individual responsibility along with obligation. This particular line of thought prevents fair distribution of the burdens along with benefits of society. While Social Justice infers in which distribution of wealth should be a fundamental rights to all strata of income levels. These ideologies are relevant inside the sense in which individuals in which are successful inside the society contain the resources to fund the HIV/AIDS disease than the less unfortunate members of the society.
Political interference has played important role in This particular issue because some politicians have used This particular opportunity to advance their political ideologies. For example, Bush administration was opposed to programs in which promote condoms however favors programs in which emphasizes on effectiveness of abstinence.
Economics, politics, the value of individual liberty, religion, along with morals all play a huge role on how public health responds to the prevention along with control of sexually transmitted disease, including HIV/AIDS. These diseases affect most of the public health along with they seek the government financially for treatment. The government has to budget money to spend on those infected by these diseases. Each segment of the government’s economics can be affected. They have to create clinics, hire qualified staff, along with provide money grants to support these places. Most of the public health clinics are free along with provide services to those who have no insurance. The financial support for STDS has been a strain on the government along with continues to be due to the stabilization of these diseases.
For the prevention of STDS, politics has significantly been involved inside the intervention in public health. For example, according to the CDC doctors were recommended to do routinely HIV-testing to many of their patients. This particular happened especially to those who were asking for STD testing, those who may have symptoms of tuberculosis, or pregnant woman coming in for their routine visits. Furthermore, these actions are a progression inside the government’s implementation inside the wellbeing of the public health. However, in which can be still controversial because an individual’s market justice can be violated. They still contain the right to opt out of This particular recommendation.
The value of individual liberty represents the choice by people to accept support through public health. inside the case of support through STDS, individuals contain the choice to be treated along with receive information educating them on prevention. The government can intervene by providing them treatment however also protection to promote safe sex. They also intervene by providing laws in which mandate individuals to be reported the health department about those who are infected by HIV/AIDS. This particular can become controversial inside the fact in which those who are infected with the disease rights to privacy can be taken away. However, there goal can be to make sure in which everyone can be protected along with government policies on public health are implemented.
Religion along with morals have similar views when in which comes to the topic of HIV/AIDS. They do not support any investments made to do research along with find cures for the disease. While the government provides prevention along with protection through education by distributing condoms in clinics, religious clergy are against This particular. They believe in abstinence along with use the Bible to support their ideologies. They also do not believe schools should discuss ways of protection through diseases to students. Hence, This particular will provide reasons for them to engage in sexual activity.
HIV/AIDS can be a global pandemic in which continues to spread to every part of the entire world. Many people in some other countries still are not educated on ways to protect themselves along with receive treatment. Condoms are not easily available as in which can be inside the United States to be protected through these diseases. Many people do not even know they have in which along with continue to spread in which amongst each some other. Funding for education along with prevention continues to still be the number one challenge for these countries.
The government in each country has to take accountability for their citizens along with seek help through first-world countries in which can aid in assistance. If they can invest money into mass communication to promote HIV/AIDS prevention then This particular can allow people to know how they can take initiative in their own health. Once they are informed in which can be up to an individual to protect themselves. The government can not force people because their market along with social justice could be violated. They can only continue to provide resources along with hopefully make a difference to lessen the spread of HIV/AIDS.