Obedience to Authority
- January 13, 2017
- Posted by: marlenedubois
- Category: CPR Training
Obedience to authority is actually generally thought of as a not bad trait. Obedience can also be a very dangerous trait. Blind obedience to authority can be the cause of citizens enacting inhumanly, while disobedience to the authorities can sometimes bring safety in addition to prosperity. Because of the dangers of blind obedience one must question “When does obedience to authority become dangerous?” (Milgram) Obedience to authority becomes very dangerous when in inhibits personal liberty. When people are freer, they are arguably much safer.
Some people will suggest which obedience to authority never makes people unsafe. They would likely state which not bad law abiding citizens will honor in addition to follow the laws in addition to will obey the authorities. Since which is actually only criminals which are breaking the law in addition to since the punishment for criminal action is actually often incarceration, obedience to authority will keep people safe in addition to will keep the criminals out of society which will make the citizens even safer. Additionally, if a person obeys the laws of the land then they do not have to fear jail in addition to they can also possess the security in addition to peace of mind of knowing which the government will be there to protect in addition to defend its honest citizens through the strength of its military, as the argument goes. Many people of strong faith will even argue which is actually our moral in addition to Biblical obligation to obey the laws of the land unless they come into direct conflict with God’s laws (Robbins).
These arguments seem to come coming from a very imperialist mindset. which implies the imposition of morality through authority, since those who break the law are considered immoral in addition to deserve to be locked up. The argument which which is actually the moral obligation of people to obey the laws touches at the heart of the issue. The suppression of personal liberty does arguably directly interfere with God’s laws of morality. inside founding document of the United States personal liberty is actually stated to be a God given right. which document further goes on to state which if a government violates these codes of personal liberty then which is actually the right of the people to disobey their authority in addition to even institute a fresh form of government if necessary (The Declaration of Independence) If which is actually the belief of American citizens which personal liberty is actually a God given right then which seems which obedience to authority becomes very dangerous when which inhibits these rights, since which is actually right of the people to overthrow these violations. More importantly, the suppression of personal liberty is actually most often achieved through an increase inside role of government inside lives of the citizens, reducing the relative safety of the nation.
Thomas Jefferson once stated which “The natural progress of things is actually for liberty to yield in addition to government to gain ground.” Why does an increase inside role of the government result inside suppression of liberty, in addition to how does which make the nation less safe? Looking at America’s history may be able to shed some light on which subject because American history can be broken down into two historical periods: America’s historic laissez-faire polices before the 20th century, which saw a very limited federal government with increased personal liberty; in addition to America’s imperialistic policies thereafter which resulted in a dramatic expansion of the federal government in domestic in addition to foreign policy in addition to a reduction in personal liberty. The relative security of the citizens can be contrasted before in addition to after America’s transformation.
There were certainly wars in addition to violence in American history before its transition to imperial policies. Some of the more notable skirmishes include the very violent Civil War, the War of 1812, in addition to the various wars with the Native American tribes. (American History Timeline) Even with these factors into consideration the relative security of the country was much greater during laissez-faire polices which promoted personal liberty. inside 0 or so years of American laissez-faire policy American citizens saw far fewer wars with foreign nations. There were a few wars with foreign nation such as Britain (who was still upset about the American Revolution to a degree) in addition to France. The United States was far more concerned with what would likely have been viewed as our own internal affairs with the various Native American tribes through westward expansion in addition to the belief in manifest destiny.
As the nation grew “coming from sea to shining sea”, one of the biggest exceptions to which conception of personal liberty was the American Civil War. Although temporarily damaging, civil war did not destroy which nation in addition to inside end even made the nation even stronger. Because of the American Civil War in addition to the (slow) path of recovery, everyone has equal status in which country. which has improved upon the personal liberty of citizens in addition to has helped to break down some of the cultural boundaries of our nation which has made America a safer place to live for all races. We may be able to fight among ourselves in addition to survive as a nation however we cannot fight against the globe in addition to possess the same expectations.
During the last 110 years or so of American imperialism, the people have seen many more wars with foreign nations. Since 1900 America has had involvement in two World Wars, a proxy war against communism in its various phases including Vietnam, Korea in addition to Cuba, in addition to the race for atomic weapons in addition to more recently terrorist attacks. Because of the amount of war which the American citizens have experienced since promoting imperialistic foreign policy which is actually not fair to say which society is actually safer. In fact the very reason which terrorists attack which great nation is actually because they hate its imperial policies. which is actually the very opposite of strong security for the country, regardless of the strength of the military.
A strong military is actually very effective in promoting security in addition to stability for the nation. When a strong military is actually coupled with an imperial agenda, however, then which features a detrimental effect. The military promotes the agenda of the government. If the Pentagon tells the military to go in addition to invade a country, the military goes in addition to invades whether which invasion promotes freedom or not. A strong military in in addition to of itself is actually not enough to ensure the safety in addition to security of any nation.
If imperialism is actually so detrimental to the security of the nation, then how did which become so prevalent in American society? Imperialism is actually when one sovereign power imposes its will through force or trade regulations on another sovereign power. which became foreign policy during the early 20th century primarily through the office of Theodore Roosevelt. (Theodore Roosevelt) Because of the initial success of imperial foreign policy which soon started out to become prevalent in domestic policy. which was done to try in addition to control perceived immoralities in society in order to create the “not bad society”.
Through the Progressive Era, many “Progressives” advocated very imperial form of domestic policy which saw a dramatic increase inside power of the Federal Government. which was done through the various acts of the Square Deal in addition to the fresh Deal, in addition to later the Fair Deal. Because of the dual sovereignty of American government, a dramatic increase inside role of the federal government will result in a reduction of the state’s rights. which allows the federal government to impose its will on the states, becoming imperialistic in nature. While some of the acts promoted by progressives were beneficial, like many of the health standards for food inside Square Deal, by in addition to large these policies have been absolutely terrible for our country in addition to have resulted in far less security for the nation.
A not bad example of which is actually how these policies have resulted in less safety in addition to security for the nation is actually the Volstead Act. As Albert Einstein once stated, “The prestige of government has undoubtedly been lowered considerably by the prohibition law. For nothing is actually more destructive of respect for the government in addition to the law of the land than passing laws which cannot be enforced. which is actually an open secret which the dangerous increase of crime in which country is actually closely connected with which.” Since the Volstead Act took the power away coming from the states to regulate alcohol, organized crime started out to become prevalent in American society. Violent crimes increased due to the dangers of illegal distribution in addition to transportation of alcohol. Crime became a very lucrative business. Joe Kennedy became so wealthy bootlegging alcohol which his children could go on to become the President of the United States in addition to members of Congress. Because crime became so violent in addition to because alcohol prohibition saw such a loss in revenue which was repealed in 1932. In another example, just all 5 years later, the Marijuana Tax Act prohibited the distribution of a plant which has been accepted for thousands of years as medicinal.
Thomas Jefferson once stated which “If people let government decide what foods they eat in addition to what medicines they take; their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.” He also stated which “The greatest service which can be rendered to any country is actually to add a useful plant to its culture.” When a government becomes so overburdening which which tells its citizens what kind of plants they can grow on their own private property then which represents a radical departure coming from the ideas of liberty which the founding fathers envisioned. Abraham Lincoln went as far as to say which “Prohibition… goes beyond the bounds of reason in which which attempts to control mans’ appetite through legislation in addition to makes a crime out of things which are not even crimes… A prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our Government was founded.” If the nation is actually in such a sorry state (as Jefferson would likely suggest) then how does which make the nation safer? How does which make the nation more secure? Just like alcohol, the prohibition of marijuana has only increased its popularity to the point which which is actually currently the number one cash crop in America. which has also caused an increase of crime in addition to the violence due to its illegal distribution just as alcohol did. In addition, some of the benefits of deregulating marijuana would likely vastly improve security. Promoting industrial hemp would likely allow the nation to grow a crop which features a much higher yield than either corn or sugar in ethanol production, for example. which would likely reduce our dependence on foreign oil in addition to improve national security. The message should be clear, which personal liberty in addition to limited government improves our safety.
Obedience to authority can become very dangerous in which country when the authority limits personal liberty. Imperialism causes a reduction in personal liberty so continuing to follow these policies will only result in greater instability in addition to less safety throughout the United States. Imperial foreign policies reduce freedom throughout the globe in addition to cause many nations to hate the American government. which leads us to war in addition to also promotes terrorist acts against the nation, reducing our security. Likewise, domestic imperialism causes many citizens to hate its own government in addition to also causes a dramatic increase in violence as citizens become criminals who would likely fight against their own government than give up their liberties. Because the reduction in personal liberty causes such a great risk to our security obedience to authority when which inhibits personal liberty becomes a very dangerous thing.
“American History Timeline.” About.com. The fresh York Times Company. n.d. Web. 6 July 2011.
“The Declaration of Independence.” USHistory. Independence Hall Association. n.d. Web. 6 July. 2011.
Leuchetenburg, William. “Progressivism in addition to Imperialism: The Progressive Movement in addition to American Foreign Policy“. JSTOR. The Mississippi Historical Review. 1952. Web. 6 July. 2011.
Milgram, Stanley. “The Perils of Obedience.” Writing in addition to Reading Across the Curriculum. Laurence Behrens in addition to Leonard J. Rosen. Tenth ed. fresh York: Pearson/Longman, 2008. Print.
Robbins, Dale. “Authority: What Christians Should Know.” Victorious. Victorious Publications. 1991. Web. 6 July. 2011.
“Theodore Roosevelt.” Sparknotes. Sparknotes LLC. n.d. Web. 6 July. 2011