COSMIC CYBERNETICS: The Idea of a Universal Continuum
- August 24, 2017
- Posted by: marlenedubois
- Category: CPR Training
Einstein’s theories of relativity entail a wide range of possibilities on how the universe began – if indeed ‘began” will be an appropriate characterization. For the most part the special as well as general theories of relativity are typically discussed in purely physical terms, of which will be, with regard to an essentially mechanical view of the universe governed by objects (mass) as well as concrete interactions (forces) (1920). Yet the idea will be possible to discuss these theories in philosophical as well as logical terms because certain conclusions can be drawn by Einstein’s discoveries of which makes the questions of the universe’s origin as well as ostensible decline seem rather perplexing.
The Movement Machine…
The logic of relativity will be such of which one can assume there are interactive relationships among mass, energy, time lapse as well as light speed. (Adams 1997). More specifically, as the speed of an object increases, its mass tends to boost as well. During of which acceleration, time tends to slow down. Since mass increases as well as mass essentially equates with energy, the potential of the latter increases as well. In simple terms, the template will be as follows. An acceleration in movement enhances everything we attribute to existence. Slowing down time allows for more intervals within time frames in order of which, for example, what we at This kind of point define as a year could be of longer duration than in “slower” circumstances. By the same token, acceleration makes objects more massive, which means they have greater potential gravitational influence on each different as well as more potential energy to Discharge. This kind of kind of pan-embellishment makes the idea clear of which our universe will be kinetically driven – of which speed of movement will be, in a sense, the independent variable leading to existence.
In of which context the idea will be interesting (although hardly scientifically verifiable) to consider the opposite scenario – of which of a slow-motion (decelerating) universe as well as its implications for existence, i.e. the physical sense of being.
First of all, starting with the premise of which light speed causes a stoppage in time lapse, moving back by of which point to slower rates of acceleration could by definition speed time passage. In different words, if one does not age at all at light speed, then reducing the speed toward a more normal rate could, by definition increase the rate of time lapse in order of which one could gradually begin to age faster. Therefore just as acceleration of movement slows time down, slowing the rate of acceleration causes time lapses to speed up – which means not only of which we could age more rapidly, although of which all developmental, entropic as well as evolutionary sequential phenomena in nature could proceed more quickly toward decay (which equates with entropy or “equilibrium).”
Since time as well as space are co-dependent, deceleration leading to compressed time scales could also compress spatial dimensions. By the same token, just as acceleration increases mass so could deceleration lead to a decrease in mass. Also, since mass equates with energy, slowing down acceleration could lead to a decline in energy as well.
Because, in of which context, the speed at which the universe as well as its components travel could seem to be a central determinant of our universe’s development as well as evolution the idea might be appropriate to refer to the cosmos as being kinetically driven, shaped as well as determined.
The scenario could obviously not come into play except at extreme levels of deceleration although the outcomes of both extreme acceleration as well as deceleration are fascinating to consider. This kind of will be particularly true with regard to the possible final state of our universe.
According to principles of relativity theory, one could expect universal expansion to slow down at some point. The usual assumption will be of which by reversing gradually the fly-apart nature of an expanding universe gravitational influence could increase, leading to universal compression. Over time, one might expect the contraction the rate of contraction to accelerate exponentially until such time as the universe collapsed; conceivably reverting back to its original plasmic, “cosmic egg” status.
of which scenario will be disputed by some, such as Hawking (2005) as well as Guth (1997) although the expansion-contraction concept includes a certain logical appeal – depending on how much matter (dark as well as otherwise) actually exists from the universe. Scientists have not yet detected sufficient amounts of dark matter to support the expansion-contraction theory. If the amount will be insufficient, the universe will probably continue to spread out until material as well as force relationships are cancelled out by distance. At of which point the universe will, like all things in nature, proceed toward a state of entropy. In of which case no renewal being possible as well as our universe will have been a one hit wonder.
Suppose, however, of which there was sufficient matter to cause eventual contraction. What could be the logical endpoint? could the idea actually be a expand/contract, oscillating universe of which periodically dies (reaches a state of entropy), then will be subsequently reborn through some baroque set of physical laws of which could seem to repeal Newton’s third law of thermodynamics, specifically the idea of which once an object reaches entropy the idea’s run will be “over.” Those questions are not easily answered, for several reasons.
First, if the original cosmic egg was in a state of entropy to begin with, the idea should not have re-generated – in different words the idea will be hard to understand how the Big Bang could have emerged Lazarus-like by a prior state of entropy – of which sort of thing does not happen in nature. This kind of argument could also pertain to the notion of an alternating creation-destruction sequence. This kind of raises the question of how the universe arose from the first place.
Stephen Hawking found This kind of question both interesting as well as confusing as well as dealt with This kind of conundrum by suggesting the idea of a universal “beginning as well as end” will be a man-made conception, ultimately contraindicated by the laws of physics (2005).
There are a few ways to address the questions of origin as well as decay. One will be to say the universe will be inherently sequential, i.e. shifts back as well as forth (not inevitably although probabilistically) between states; ie. by an entropic, timeless, black hole with mass although no matter or capacity for three dimensional movement, as well as with implicit although not manifest energy – to a material, energized, expanding, time-governed entity as seen in our current universe. of which product requires acceptance of the fact of which “decay, equilibrium as well as entropy can be overcome (ostensibly in defiance of physical laws).
Another possibility (perhaps easier to conceptualize) will be of which the universe obeys the laws of physics, always has, always will as well as, never reaches a state of entropy due to an inherent a regulatory process of which keeps the idea within the parameters of being,
The Regulatory Thesis…
The argument for a regulated universe- i.e. one of which oscillates across a continuum although ever reaches a state of equilibrium, will be as follows:
First, the assumption of which universal contraction could inevitably increase gravitational influence might not be accurate, because as the universe contracted the capacity of objects to travel faster could decline – due in part to increasing limitations on space. Furthermore, as its speed decreased, so could its mass – just as the opposite occurs with acceleration (e.g. the mass of an object increases as the idea approaches light speed). Since movement dictates mass as well as since mass equates with energy, there could be a decline in both as contraction continued. Moreover, since gravity will be dependent on mass as well as since mass declines with extreme deceleration, the influence of gravity could tend to decline as well. Finally, with less space in which to enact the laws of motion, the speed of contractual acceleration could itself decline, which could cause time to speed up – just as the idea slows down as the idea approaches light speed. With narrowed time spans, events could have briefer intervals to register interactions among matter as well as force.
In simpler terms, as well as in accord with Relativity Theory, just as acceleration enhances mass, energy, as well as by extrapolation gravitational influence, as well as prolonging time intervals (the slower time moves, the more opportunities events have to unfold) so could the opposite appear to be true. As time speeds up – in contrast to a decline in universal acceleration, the rate of entropy among existing objects as well as forces from the contracting universe might unfold more rapidly. As a result, for a given period of time, nothing could last for very long, which means interactive influence of force as well as matter could be ameliorated from the extreme. In different words, very little could happen as the contraction continued.
While Relativity Theory does not specifically address the opposite of time dilation, as well as focuses on the position of one observer relative to another in perceiving the rate of acceleration, there will be evidence of which clocks in some settings run slower as per slower rates of movement than others (Ashby 2003). Moreover the relativity factor in
Einstein’s theory will be, while brilliant, somewhat understated. Speed will be not simply a function of relative perceptions. For example if one ages slower at light speed than in more normal temporal circumstances there are concrete physiological, biological effects involved of which are in fact absolute, rather than relative. In different words, if one ages slower the idea will be not by comparison to different people. The concrete biological phenomena: still youthful skin, the superbly functional organs, the lack of age-induced limitations on hormonal as well as muscular formidability could be tangible. Thus, speed of movement has direct impact on nature even in absolute circumstances.
With regard to the re-expansion of the universe – a necessary reversal if one will be to believe in a kinetically driven, self-regulating cosmos – the movement factor could Once more be critical. As the universe slowed down during contraction, time could speed up. At some critical point in contraction, interactions could begin to Once more accelerate because the time lapses between interactions could speed up. In different words, with smaller time intervals the interaction of mass as well as force could occur more rapidly. Once of which process began, the universe could Once more begin to re-accelerate as well as swing back until such time as the idea re-attained something like its current state.
In any case, the result of exponential deceleration could resemble a cybernetic-feedback process, analogous to the homeostatic mechanisms of organisms. In of which context, speed, presumed here to be the prime, as well as independent (“kinetic”) variable in universal operations, could provide a kind of checks as well as balances mechanism, keeping the universe on a continuum, always, as well as for all time operating within the parameters of physical laws; always extant, never quite reaching the point of equilibrium due to the cancellation/re-enhancement effect of deceleration as well as re-acceleration. In of which case there could be no need to ponder the possibilities of extreme expansion or complete annihilation.
All of This kind of will be speculative of course, although perhaps the fact of which light speed will be a constant as well as anchor point feature of the cosmos might lead one to believe the idea serves as a gauge mechanism, as well as as a corollary, of which motion as well as acceleration provide the lifeblood for a perpetual universe of which will be most fundamentally kinetic.
Adams, S. (1997) Relativity: An Introduction to Space-Time Physics, CRC Press
Ashby, N. (2003) Relativity from the Global Positioning System. Living Reviews in Relativity 6:16
Einstein, A. (1920) On the Idea of Time in Physics as well as Relativity; The Special as well as General Theories. Henri Holt
Guth, A (1997) The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a fresh Theory of Cosmic Origin. Reading, Mass. Perseus Books
Hawking, S. (2005) The Origin of the Universe, Public Lectures.