Big History along with also Donald Trump alterations
- March 25, 2017
- Posted by: marlenedubois
- Category: CPR Training
Before the last-minute intervention of the FBI director in October, 2016, Donald Trump’s presidential campaign appeared to be unraveling. Most Republicans were frustrated because they felt he went into the election which has a winning hand based on a call for change. “This specific election can be all about change,” can be what we heard through “Establishment Republicans” along with also Trump surrogates. With Trump’s surprising victory came enthusiasm by all varieties of Republicans for impending change.
When not sabotaging his campaign by displaying personal flaws, Trump rattled off numerous alterations needed to undo the Obama administration in domestic along with also foreign policy. Establishment Republicans embraced the anti-Obama alterations as great strides forward in which could soon boost the American economy.
When This specific election can be viewed in historical perspective, we see in which Trump’s message was essentially anti-change. His alterations attempt to reverse irresistible demographic, economic, along with also international forces. His candidacy represents decades of Republican efforts to avoid embracing significant alterations resulting through historical forces unleashed by the combination of industrialization, unrestrained capitalism, along with also science. however Republicans are not the only ones chafing through the impact of these alterations which feel overwhelming to much of the entire world, not just our country.
To gain perspective on This specific recent electoral victory, we need to look at Republican electoral strategy inside the twentieth century along with also at a much larger picture gained by using something called Big History. Promising to turn back the clock after an era of reform can be a “tried along with also true” Republican formula in which worked again.
The theme of “Make America Great Again” can be a rehash of the successful Republican strategy inside the 1920 election. Beginning with the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt, America experienced two decades of reforms pushed by the Progressive movement. Roosevelt failed to turn the Republican Party into the party of Progressivism, losing out to business along with also financial forces in which continue to dominate the party today. Democrats under Woodrow Wilson became the leaders of Progressive reform, resulting in constitutional amendments prohibiting sale of alcohol along with also the national vote for women. During World War I the economy was managed for once, resulting in prosperity during the war despite Republican resistance. With the end of the war, Republicans along with also the public demanded a hasty return to business as usual, forcing too fast a transition through regulation along with also bringing about a recession in which was exploited inside the election of 1920.
The Republican call for a return to “Normalcy” meant turning away through reforms putting more authority inside the hands of the federal government along with also toward traditional laissez faire policies supporting unrestrained capitalism. The boom of much of the 20s obscured the economic calamity endured by farmers who were neglected until the crash of 1929 brought in Democrats concerned about farmers along with also labor as well as business. Returning to “Normalcy” meant tax cuts to business in which spurred dramatic growth along with financial speculation as little effort was made to regulate increasing excesses on Wall Street. IRS figures indicate in which the 20s were a period of increasing concentration of wealth inside the hands of a minuscule percentage of the population.
My first point, then, can be in which “Make America Great Again” can be a rehash of returning to “Normalcy” – which means tax cuts to business along with also pulling back on regulatory efforts in which might prevent another 1929 or 2007. the item means continued concentration of wealth in a modest percentage of the population. the item also means pulling back on important social, economic, along with also political reforms as rejection of “political correctness.”
My second point can be in which seeing Trump through the vantage point of Big History reveals even deeper cause for concern.
What can be “Big History?” the item can be a brand-new approach to world history in which embraces multiple science along with also liberal arts disciplines to gain perspective on history since the Big Bang. Study of the evolution of the universe as part of the human story includes the origin of life on our planet, evolution of our species, along with also the dramatic evolution of human culture through societies based on agriculture to contemporary industrial-capitalist societies.
Big History covers billions of years along with also loads of information not usually included in histories. however the item also brings a perspective in which can be especially needed in our time. The first textbook on Big History tells the story in terms of reaching along with also surpassing eight thresholds. Each threshold brings progress as a brand-new level of complexity along with also opportunity can be reached. With the accomplishment of each also comes increased vulnerability along with also fragility as a higher level of danger comes with each increase in complexity.
The most recent threshold has been the transition of human cultures through societies based on agriculture to industrial-capitalist societies. Important alterations have included accelerated population growth, depletion of non-renewable resources essential to industrial-capitalism, development of nuclear capacity for weapons along with also generating electricity, along with also communication along with also transportation technologies in which increasingly integrate the entire world economically. Side-effects include more global epidemics along with also use of the internet as an instrument for war along with also destabilizing misinformation as well as a social along with also economic integrator.
Two large issues stand out in which are resisted by Trump along with also his supporters. First can be the need to begin ameliorating along with also, if possible, reversing human damage to our planet. Business forces have too often supported Republican efforts to deny global warming along with also various other climate issues in which are already threatening national security of all nations.
The second issue highlighted by Big History can be the impact of accelerating change. Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution inside the 1700s, innovations have occurred at an increasing rate. Innovation may be not bad for business, however the item necessitates unrelenting social, economic, along with also political adjustments. Birth control pills, television, portable computers, the internet, smart phones, along with also tablets have all revolutionized our economy inside the recent past. These fantastically appealing innovations have challenged traditional social values along with also radically modified daily environments we experience at work along with also in our homes. Furthermore, This specific radical experience of change can be accelerating. There has been no letting up to allow us to absorb one wave of innovative revolution before another hits us. The demand through Wall Street in which companies like Apple continue to invent revolutionary products can be growing stronger as the rate of change continues to accelerate.
Donald Trump appears to represent the business forces calling for more change, however in which can be not the heart of his message. Trump’s call to reverse the Obama administration along with also his personal example of disregarding political correctness have brought to the forefront discontented fringe elements in our society who reject fundamental alterations in social norms. These forces represent opposition to the loss of white male dominance. Increased rights along with also prominence of women, African-Americans, disabled people, LGBT groups, Latinos, along with also Muslims are civil rights gains in which are not accepted by groups who want to return to the “Normalcy” of the 1950s along with also earlier. The violence of their rhetoric along with also behavior mirror the anxiety of most Americans over the pace along with also extent of change in which keeps shaking up social norms. Attacking political correctness shows anxiety over the vocabulary alterations in which keep coming as we are told to use certain words rather than our usual terminology to keep through offending groups. Our usual behavior can be constantly challenged by brand-new along with also unexpected social groups demanding recognition along with also respect.
The more Republicans act to make industrial-capitalism more effective by removing “unnecessary regulations,” the more change will continue to accelerate. in which means degradation of our planet in which may soon be irreversible. in which means faster implementation of innovations with gigantic effects on social norms in which hold a society together. the item means in which sooner or later we are likely to reach a point at which human capacity for change can be saturated with disastrous consequences in which are hard to predict. Many scholars think in which societal collapse can be the most likely outcome – along with also an M.I.T. computer style has predicted the item will probably happen by around 2050 if not before.
Political campaigns in which unleash hostilities toward these rapid social alterations are becoming a threat to our democracy along with also our constitution. As Donald Trump continues to “be Donald Trump,” he can be galvanizing resistance to social change while he can be taking actions to further accelerate change. As the pace of change continues to accelerate, we can expect various other Trump-like figures to emerge as the voice of fear along with also anxiety.
Let’s trust someone emerges who can address irresistible alterations in ways in which assuage public fear along with also anxiety – along with also in which we have members of Congress who will get behind This specific approach rather than continue to give priority to the interest of their political party.